Time Lost and Time Regained: A Short Essay on the Eternity of God
Author Details
Journal Details
Published
Published: 21 March 2017 | Article Type :Abstract
In philosophy of religion and analytical theology there is a substantial debate about God’s relation to time. The traditional, Christian theistic stance, championed by Boethius, Augustine, Aquinas, and others, is that God is timelessly eternal. This is opposed by Nicholas Wolterstorff, Richard Swinburne, and some other major philosophers of religion. Wolterstorff’s objections to the traditional position were examined to bring to light how the critics of the belief that God is eternal fail to appreciate how the traditional stance is pitted against anthropomorphism. It affirmed the unique self-subsistence of God as Creator, and the goodness of temporality.
Keywords: Anthropomorphism, eternity, God, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Richard Swinburne, temporality, time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
Statistics
403 Views
731 Downloads
Volume & Issue
Article Type
How to Cite
Citation:
Charles Taliaferro. (2017-03-21). "Time Lost and Time Regained: A Short Essay on the Eternity of God." *Volume 1*, 1, 33-37