Radical Rupture: Chabad’s Theological Continuity When Divine Withdrawal Precedes Sin
Author Details
Journal Details
Published
Published: 10 July 2025 | Article Type : Research ArticleAbstract
Lubavitcher Rebbe’s understanding of tzimtzum represents perhaps the most radical theological departure in modern Chabad scholarship. This article examines Eli Rubin’s claim that the seventh Rebbe fundamentally inverted traditional Chabad theodicy, positioning divine contraction as the precursor rather than consequence of sin. Through comparative analysis with earlier Chabad rebbes and engagement with contemporary scholars including Moshe Idel, Elliot Wolfson, Shaul Magid, Michael Fishbane, and Daniel Matt, we explore whether Rubin’s reading reveals genuine innovation or hermeneutical overreach. The analysis culminates in examining potential connections to Jonathan Eybeschütz’s mystical formulation “ve-avo hayom el ha-ayin” (and I shall come today to the Nothing), investigating whether the Rebbe’s alleged radicalism represents a return to earlier kabbalistic trajectories or an unprecedented theological rupture.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
Statistics
22 Views
42 Downloads
Volume & Issue
Article Type
Research Article
How to Cite
Citation:
Julian Ungar-Sargon MD PhD. (2025-07-10). "Radical Rupture: Chabad’s Theological Continuity When Divine Withdrawal Precedes Sin." *Volume 7*, 3, 35-48